Readers Write: MTA plays tricks to hide cost of No. 7 line

The Island Now

There is more to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority New York City Transit starting service on the No. 7 subway line to the new 34th Street 11th Ave Hudson Yards station on Sept. 13 that few are aware of.   

Remember Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s ceremonial ride on the No. 7 train back in December 2013 to the same unopened station?  

It was clearly just another feel good photo op for a lame duck mayor and other politicians.   

The original cost of the overall project was $2.1 billion and is now $2.4 billion not counting the subway station that had to be dropped from the original scope of work along with additional subway cars necessary to provide opening day service for transit riders.  

Neither New York City nor the MTA could find $500 million to cover the proposed new intermediate subway station to be built at 10th Avenue and 41st Street. 

This station was part of the original project. 

One trick used by transit managers to complete any project within budget, is to drop a portion of the original work. 

This saves the necessary dollars which were not available to deliver 100 percent of what was originally promised. 

Deletion of this second station kept the project cost at $2.4 billion rather than $2.9 billion.

Construction started in 2007 with a planned completion date of December 2013.  

The anticipated first day of public service slipped several times from this date.  

First, by six months to June 2014; second, eight more months to February 2015; third, four more months to June 2015 and now finally Sept. 13, 2015.

What the public, transit riders, transit advocacy groups and the media is unaware of is MTA’s senior management decision when the project was in the planning stage several years prior to 2007.  

They instructed staff deliberately not to follow the federal National Environmental Protection Act process or enter the U.S. Department of Transportation New Starts process.  

The MTA did not want to go after New Starts funding for this project. 

This would have had this project compete against both the Long Island Rail Road East Side Access to Grand Central Terminal and New York City Transit Phase One Second Avenue Subway projects for U.S. DOT federal New Starts funding. 

The MTA provided no financial assistance and insisted New York City pay for virtually all of the project costs 

The MTA could have leveraged the $2.4 billion in locally committed funding to apply for up to $500 million in federal New Starts funding.  

Using $2.4 billion as local share would have demonstrated local commitment, financial capacity and significant overmatch for justification of these additional dollars from Washington.  

These funds could have convinced U.S. DOT to provide $500 million in federal funding that would have paid for the deleted station at 10th Avenue and 41st Street.

Offering to pay over 80 percent of the total project cost, would have made it easier for both City Hall and the MTA to compete against other transit agencies around the nation who has their own proposed New Starts project, to obtain $500 million.  

Work for the deleted station could have been part of original construction bid package awarded in 2007.  It could have been included as an option to the base bid.  

This would have afforded the MTA Office of Capital Construction the opportunity to add the deleted station as part of the base construction contract at a later date if funding was found. 

Should the MTA find future funding for this station, the cost could be significantly higher than $500 million. The MTA will need a new procurement and third party contractor to build the station.  

New York City Transit Authority will have to spend millions providing their own employee Force Account to support the construction contractor.  

They will be needed to provide flagging support which insures the safety of private contractor employees who will have to work adjacent to active subway tracks.  

The new contractor will also require a staging area for supplies and other support equipment. The previous contractor already had a staging area for supplies, support equipment and employees already mobilized to do the work.  

They had little need for NYCT Force Account flagging support as there was no active subway service.  

It would have been cheaper to the build the deleted station with the existing contractor already mobilized, on site with few obstacles.

At the end of the day, riders and taxpayers have to ask if $2.4 billion for a 1.5 mile extension including one additional station built 21 months behind schedule is worth the cost.

Larry Penner

Great Neck

Share this Article