It is most unethical and prejudicial minded to single out a few names out of the 100 and put their pictures and names in the paper.
To penalize people that are lured by undercover police into a trap, and then blaming them, is nothing short of most outrageous waste of taxpayers’ moneys.
Enticing a hungry person to come and eat and then blaming why he stole the food is a nonsense accusation. Is there reason that you had to mention the first couple of names twice and not mention the 98 other names.
Either you put all the pictures, or put none. Life and privacy of all is taken for granted by the editor (by force or none).
I love this paper and I am shocked such quality paper has to utilize such tool for higher readership.
B. Benjamin
Great Neck
