Carl Abraham’s April 6 letter is mistitled (“Science doesn’t back LED opposition”) — the title implies that he presents scientific evidence that refutes Rebecca Gilliar’s (and my) statements concerning the health hazards of LED lights.
Instead, he starts with a list of communities that are switching to LEDs. All this indicates is that the public at large (including our elected leaders) is still in a state of ignorance about the health hazards of LED lights.
He then touts their environmental benefits.
Not one word refuting their health hazards! He mentions the importance of peer-reviewed articles, but does not cite any.
I, on the other hand, have presented the results of several peer-reviewed studies (of which I believe Rebecca is also aware), in addition to the official recommendations of the American Medical Association.
These scientists and doctors all agree that the blue-rich light emitted by the current generation of white LED lights is harmful to both human health and to the environment.
For those who want to learn more about the health implications of LED lights, and wireless networks as well, Patti Wood, environmental expert and director of Grassroots Environmental Education (based in Port Washington), will be giving a presentation called “Is our technological world putting our health at risk?” at the Great Neck Library (Main branch) on May 23 from 7 – 8:30 p.m. I urge you to attend.
Amy Glass, Ph.D.
Great Neck
